SEBI Reviews Total Expense Ratio (TER) of Mutual Fund Schemes after 22 years; what's in store for investors?
Capital markets regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), after 22 years revised the total expense ratio (TER) of mutual funds. In an attempt to reduce mis-selling and costs, the capital market regulator revised the TER in a board meeting on 18 September. The slab wise limits of TER introduced under SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 have not been changed since then. “For starters lower expenses would translate into better returns for the investor. This would increase transparency as all scheme expenses are to be made public”, said Ganti Murthy, senior fund manager and fixed income professional.
The Assets Under Management
(AUM) of mutual fund industry in India has grown manifold over the years. As on
August 31, 2018, the AUM of the industry has crossed Rs 25 lakh crore.
SEBI is of the view
that while the AUM has grown multiple times, the benefit of economies of scale
has not been fully shared with the investors. It is also observed that over a period,
there have been varying practices in the industry with respect to charging of
expenses and payment of commissions.
SEBI undertook an internal
study to review the TER. The analysis along
with observations of the study was placed in a meeting of the Mutual Fund Advisory
Committee (MFAC). The working group constituted by MFAC deliberated on the
issues and submitted a report to MFAC. Upon deliberation on the findings of
working group, MFAC made several recommendations on transparency in expenses,
TER for various types of mutual fund schemes, investments through SIPs, limiting
the additional incentives for B-30 cities based on inflows from retail
investors, performance disclosure of Mutual Fund schemes, etc.
Accordingly, the Board
approved the following proposals:
Transparency in Expenses:
SEBI has not only reviewed the TER but it also
stated about the distributors compensation. The regulatory body mandated that all
commission and expenses, etc. shall necessarily be paid from the scheme only
and not from the AMC/Associate/Sponsor/Trustee, or any other route.
Further, the mutual fund industry must adopt the
full trail model of commission in all schemes without payment of any upfront
commission or upfronting of any trail commission. An upfront commission is a
fee a customer pays to a distributor for investing in a mutual fund scheme.
While the commission is meant to incentivize distributors to bring in new
investors, there is a fear that distributors may mis-sell products or make
existing investors churn their portfolios unnecessarily to earn higher
commissions.
Association of Mutual
Funds in India (Amfi) in April 2015 urged the AMCs in India to cap the maximum
rate of upfront commission at 1% and the total payout to distributors,
including trail commission, at 1.75% for every year during the life of a mutual
fund scheme. While upfront commissions are paid by AMCs to agents on the sale
of a product, trail commission is paid through the life of a scheme.
AUM Slab
(INR crore)
|
TER for equity
oriented
schemes
|
TER for other
schemes
(excl.
Index, ETFs and
Fund of Funds)
|
0 -500
|
2.25%
|
2.00%
|
500-750
|
2.00%
|
1.75%
|
750-2000
|
1.75%
|
1.50%
|
2000-5000
|
1.60%
|
1.35%
|
5000-10000
|
1.50%
|
1.25%
|
10000-50000
|
TER reduction of
0.05% for
every increase of
5,000
crore AUM or part
thereof
|
TER
reduction of 0.05%
for
every increase of
5,000
crore AUM or part
thereof
|
>50000
|
1.05%
|
0.80%
|
TER for Close Ended
and Interval Schemes:
TER for equity-oriented
schemes shall be a maximum of 1.25% and for other than equity oriented
schemes shall be a maximum of 1%.
TER for Index schemes,
Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and Fund of Funds:
a)
Index Funds and ETFs:
The TER shall be a maximum of 1.00%.
b) Fund of Funds (FoFs): The TER of FoF scheme, shall be a maximum of twice the TER of the underlying funds.
b) Fund of Funds (FoFs): The TER of FoF scheme, shall be a maximum of twice the TER of the underlying funds.
i) FoFs investing
primarily in Liquid, Index and ETF schemes: Total TER (including the TER of
underlying schemes) shall be maximum of 1.00%
ii) FoFs investing primarily
in active underlying schemes: Total TER (including the TER of the underlying
schemes), shall be maximum of 2.25% for equity-oriented schemes, and maximum of
2% for other than equity-oriented schemes.
AMCs usually pay
higher upfront commission on business from B-30 cities. The commissions are
higher by 1% to 1.5%. But the market regulator Sebi has now said that the
additional expense permitted for penetration in B-30 cities, shall be based on inflows
from retail investors. The definition of ‘retail investors’ shall be determined
in consultation with the industry. Pending such clarification, the additional incentive
shall be permitted for inflows from individual investors only and not on
inflows from corporates and institutions. Further, the B-30 incentive shall be
paid as trail only. “Fund houses would be affected as their business plans go
for a toss”, added Murty.
The Board proposals
were based on to provide benefits with respect to sharing of economies of scale, lowering
the cost for mutual fund investors, bringing in transparency in appropriation of
expenses, and reducing mis-selling and churning. Although, SEBI has reduced TER,
at the same time it has also banned upfront commissions and asked the industry
to adopt the full trail model of commission in all schemes which are obligatorily
to be charged to the schemes. So, overall it might not translate into better
returns for the investors?
Comments
Post a Comment